The Court sets an expedited hearing
The Supreme Court scheduled oral argument for January 10 in the consolidated TikTok cases.
Read context
Scheduling a hearing did not decide whether the law was constitutional.
Follow the fast-moving Supreme Court stage of the TikTok divestiture-or-restriction dispute. Court scheduling, oral argument and judgment are separate from later enforcement choices.
The Supreme Court phase ends January 17, 2025. Later ownership arrangements and enforcement extensions are outside this collection.
Dates without a time use the local date of the event.
The Supreme Court scheduled oral argument for January 10 in the consolidated TikTok cases.
Scheduling a hearing did not decide whether the law was constitutional.
The Supreme Court heard arguments about the challenged law and the constitutional objections raised against it.
Arguments are the parties' positions. The transcript is not itself the Court's ruling.
The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's judgment, rejecting the First Amendment challenge before it.
This judgment concerns the legal challenge. It does not by itself describe TikTok's present availability.
The Supreme Court phase ends January 17, 2025. Later ownership arrangements and enforcement extensions are outside this collection.